Saturday, 30 July 2011

My quest for perfection: how Photoshop has distorted my perception of normal

Like most women, I am well aware that the images I see in the media are Photoshopped. However, I was not aware of this fact in my formative years when I first started reading magazines. In fact, I don't think that I had even heard of Photoshop until I was well into my 20's. I believe that all of this Photoshopping in the media has really distorted what I see as normal, and what I believe is flawed.

For years, people have been telling me that I have a gorgeous peaches and cream complexion, but I have never really believed them. I have just assumed that they were being polite. I have blackheads on my nose and bumpy skin under my eyes. There is some faint pigmentation on my forehead and the odd blotch on my cheeks. Plus I still get pimples. Obviously the flaws are evident to everyone, so clearly my complexion isn't gorgeous, is it?

I also have a real phobia about wearing foundation. I hate it and only wear it for very special occasions. Why? Because you can always see that I am wearing foundation. According to the pictures in magazines, that shouldn't be the case. It should be completely flawless and virtually invisible to the naked eye. I have searched high and low for this elusive foundation that is undetectable on my skin, without any luck. There are just no invisible foundations on the market. Even though I know that the images I see are Photoshopped, they have completely distorted what I believe looks good. So, even though I know it is not possible for foundation to be invisible, I am never happy with how it looks on my skin as it doesn't look anything like how it does in the magazines.

It has taken me years to come to the following realisations - that the hideous flaws in my skin that irritate me so much are in reality only flaws to me. To sell products, the beauty industry has to convince us that we are flawed so that we will then either treat or cover our flaws. They then show us impossible images of Photoshopped perfection to aspire to. Naturally we fail, so we try a new product with better claims, and the cycle continues. So, I thought that I'd share the realisations I have come to in the hope that it might help someone else see their skin in a better light.
  • Blackheads are not nearly as noticeable or as hideous as you think. They were probably my biggest beauty worry until one day I came to the realisation that I literally have never noticed any blackheads on another person. When I examine my skin in the mirror it is usually from a distance of 10cm away. When are you ever that close to another person? Whenever I am talking to someone my eyes a drawn to either the other persons eyes or lips so I never even register what their nose looks like. I guess, ask yourself whether you can list, off the top of your head, 5 people who have obvious blackheads. I bet you can't. Therefore, I bet there are less than 5 people in the world who have noticed that you have them.
  • Pigmentation is another bugbear of mine yet it is also another 'condition' that I rarely notice on other people. To be perfectly honest, I don't think that I was even concerned about uneven skin tone until beauty companies told me that I should be. It was probably the ads for SKII promoting clearer skin that got me worrying that I also had that flaw which needed treating. Do the challenge above and try to name 5 people who have pigmentation issues on their skin. If you can't name 5 then stop being concerned about your 'flaw'!
  • Freckles - this is not a 'flaw' that concerns me personally but I but I have recently been reading in forums about people asking whether you can bleach them off with lemon or have them removed by laser. I personally think freckles look gorgeous so can't understand why someone would hate them, but then the media is forever promoting clear skin or even skin tone so it is understandable that people would think that their skin was flawed. The media would never dare claim that black skin or Asian skin was flawed and that it should be bleached, yet it is OK to convince someone with freckled skin, whom they have no more control over than skin of any other ethnicity, that their skin is flawed. Let me tell you, it isn't.
Recently, in the UK, the picture below of Julia Roberts was banned for being too Photoshopped. I think that it is about time such action is taken. I personally don't mind the idea of images in ads being Photoshopped, as you expect them to be all glossy and touched up. Though, it would be nice if they did come with a disclaimer at the bottom of the ad saying that the image had been Photoshopped. Where I would like to see the change is in the actual magazine articles. If they are going a tutorial on a makeup look, it would be so much more beneficial for the reader if they did not Photoshop the image so that we can see what foundation should really look like; that it is normal to have some crepiness around the eye when eyeshadow is applied; that lipstick still looks beautiful on lips that aren't quite as full as Angelina's.
Image courtesy of Gawker

The points above are some of the major reasons why I have ditched the printed media in favour of blogs. I love that I can see a Face of the Day, that has visible foundation yet still looks amazing. Or an Eye of the Day that has the crepinessPhotoshop the image so that if we ever try to recreate the look then we are guaranteed to fail.

Are you able to look at an image and dismiss it as being Photoshopped or has Photoshopping also distorted your perception of normality?

Have you entered my latest giveaway? Here's the link if you haven't checked it out yet.

Comments (11)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
So true. It's good to keep perceived 'flaws' in perspective. Print media certainly doesn't help! :)
1 reply · active less than 1 minute ago
Its taken me manyyears and many $$$ to finally accept them. If mags showed what skin really looks likeI would never have been so obsessed with fixing the unfixable!

From: notifications@intensedebatemail.com
To: starran@hotmail.com
Subject: http://sarah-thescienceofbeauty.blogspot.com/ - New comment on: My quest for perfection: how Photoshop has distorted my perception of normal
This is a really great article, and something I thought about when a girl once said to me, "Oh, you have great skin! People never notice skin unless their own is bad."
And that's sorta true. I look at my own flaws and instinctively compare them to other people, completely ignoring the things which they themselves would consider to be flaws. Case in point - My slightly roman, dominant nose slants diagonally to one side. I KNOW this. Yet no one else has ever picked it up until I pointed it out. My older sister had an involved nosejob, removing the hump and slight hook from her nose, and I didnt NOTICE until one of my sisters pointed it out. I'm so involved with my own flaws everyone elses don't exist.

Hurr. Hope that made sense. What I'm trying to say is that I completely agree and there should be warning on these types of images, or at least a rundown of what effects where used on the image (airbrush, color balance, image stamp, blemish removal, false eyelashes, etc.) Like the rundown of products on a fashion editorial page.
1 reply · active less than 1 minute ago
That's a really great idea - the editing run down - might finally help us understand what real humans look like!! The silly thing is that we see hundreds of real humans in our day to day lives but it is the impossible media images we aspire to.

It wasn't until last year that I came to these realizations and for me it came down to products. I was wondering why I never had a hugely noticeable effect when I used these products that were meant to fix the issues I had. It was only then I realised that my 'flaws' were so minor even if they were corrected it wouldn't make a significant difference to how I looked.

Sent from my iPhone
A few weeks ago, I found out that one of my favorite new bloggers photoshopped the everloving heck out of her makeup looks. I was baffled, disappointed and felt so betrayed. The before and after photos looked so different. It's why I don't shop my own photos, and if I did, I'd say so. I don't want people feeling lied to. Why can't human beings just be human beings?

That said, I actually have found some very good foundations that meld so flawlessly into my skin I don't even blend them into my neck. It's all about the right match, I think.
1 reply · active 713 weeks ago
Ooh...I'd love to hear what these foundations are. That is so annoying about the blogger photoshopping - if thats the case you may as well just go straight to magazines...

From: notifications@intensedebatemail.com
To: starran@hotmail.com
Subject: http://sarah-thescienceofbeauty.blogspot.com/ - New comment on: My quest for perfection: how Photoshop has distorted my perception of normal
I'm a photographer and I am still fooled by photoshopped images. It's so hard to get that idea of "perfection" out of your mind when you look in the mirror. It's not real and even with labels, people still won't realise it's unattainable. Blogs definitely help reinforce positive body images with unretouched photos.
1 reply · active 713 weeks ago
Thats reassuring, but also scary, that you are fooled by photoshop images. I mean, if a photographer can be fooled, what hope does the regular joe have whoviews these images. I used to think that it was justbody shape images that theprint media mess with but now am realising just how much it is the entire image, and our perception of what is normal, that has become so messed up. Its probably also why the stars without makeup magazine editions sells so well as it is the only time we get to see them looking more like us!

From: notifications@intensedebatemail.com
To: starran@hotmail.com
Subject: http://sarah-thescienceofbeauty.blogspot.com/ - New comment on: My quest for perfection: how Photoshop has distorted my perception of normal
"I am well aware that the images I see in the media are Photoshopped. However, I was not aware of this fact in my formative years when I first started reading magazines." This really resonates with me. I also thought those models had flawless, poreless skin, though I should have known better. It made me feel bad about myself.

As for Julia Roberts, she is a beautiful woman. A beautiful 45 YEAR OLD woman for god's sake. Her neck is probably sagging along with her upper eyelids. Her skin is losing elasticity, and she probably has plenty of fine lines, given how fair she is. I expect a little retouching, but when magazines and ads post images of middle-aged women who still look like they did in their late 20s/early 30s, it sends the wrong message, that getting older is ugly. That infuriates me to no end.

As for freckles, they are sun damage. I have never heard of a baby being born with freckles, so those spots emerge from exposure to sun. That said, I think they are lovely and used to embrace the sprinkling that emerged across the bridge of my nose each summer. In my 40s, however, they start to merge and look less like freckles than splotches, so it might be something worth considering in your younger years, to wear a hat part of the time outdoors. (I'm not a big fan of sunblock because it prohibits absorption of cancer-fighting vitamin D).

Interesting that the picture of JR was banned, though. Didn't the UK also ban those semi-naked Dove ads? Or maybe that was the US because the bodies were *real* and not all were svelte and muscular.

Disclaimer: I absolutely DO blur out the upper lip hair in my lip swatches! To the naked eye, those hairs are blonde and practically unnoticeable, but when shot with digital macro, they look like a frigging dense forest. Trust me, I am doing my readers a favor. ;-)
The universe is orderly the best way to know and understood it is to approach it objectively utilizing the intellectual tools of rationalism education and empiricism. Once we follow the triples our life running in a sleek direction.

Post a new comment

Comments by