Saturday, 18 June 2011

Product review: Napoleon Perdis Auto Pilot Pre Foundation Primer versus Face of Australia Face Base Primer

I recently wrote a blog describing how makeup primers work and thought that I'd review a few primers that I have used. I read on the Vogue Forum that the Face of Australia Face Base and the Napoleon Perdis Auto Pilot Pre Foundation Primer were actually exactly the same. As Napoleon Perdis Auto Pilot Pre Foundation Primer is about four times the price of the Face of Australia Face Base I thought that I would investigate further to see if they really could be the same product.

About Each Product

Face of Australia Face Base RRP $11.95
Face of Australia state on their website that the Face Base Primer is specially formulated to apply under your foundation to improve your complexion and assist make-up last longer. Face Base Primer contains Vitamin E to nourish and hydrate skin and chamomile to smooth your complexion, leaving it fresher and brighter, ready for foundation application. The Face Base Primer fills fine lines for a more balanced surface, so that your foundation applies evenly and stays on longer for all-day flawless skin.


Napoleon Perdis Auto Pilot Pre Foundation Primer RRP $49.50
The following description was offered of Napoleon Perdis Auto Pilot Pre Foundation Primer on their website: “Not to Prime is a Crime!”. Makeup has never had a smoother landing. Get (even more) gorgeous with this gentle, pre-makeup base. Scientifically formulated to allow your makeup to “automatically” glide over the skin, Auto Pilot helps to prime and soothe the complexion for that flawless finish and helps makeup last even longer. Chamomile, Yarrow extract and Vitamin E deliver complexion perfection and instant hydration for all skin types.

The Comparison
I started with the obvious and examined the ingredients for each primer, as listed on the backs of the tubes, side by side.


Face of Australia Face Base
Napoleon Perdis Auto Pilot Primer
Water (Aqua)
Water (Aqua)
Isopropyl Palmitate
Isopropyl Palmitate
Propylene Grycol
Propylene Grycol
Glycerin
Glycerin
Stearic Acid
Stearic Acid
Dimethicone
Dimethicone
Glyceryl Stearate
Glyceryl Stearate
Triethanolamine
Triethanolamine
Tocopheryl Acetate
Vitamin E (Tocopheryl Acetate)
Achillea Millefolium Extract
Yarrow Extract (Achillea Millefolium)
Chamomilla Recutita (Matricaria) Flower Extract
Chamomile Extract (Chamomilla Recutita Flower)
Fragrance (Parfum)
Fragrance (Parfum)
Imidazolidinyl Urea
Imidazolidinyl Urea
Carbomer
Carbomer
Methylparaben
Methylparaben
Propylparaben
Propylparaben
Tetrasodium EDTA
Tetrasodium EDTA

As you can see, they are exactly the same. As they are listed in exactly the same order, it is more than likely that the concentrations of each ingredient are the same in both products.

Consistency
I honestly couldn't see or feel any real difference in the consistency of these two primers. Napoleon Perdis Auto Pilot Primer may have been slightly runnier coming out of the tube but I did not feel a difference applying either of the primers to my face.

Smell
Even the fragrance of the two is very similar - a very stock standard lotion type smell. The Napoleon Perdis Auto Pilot Primer is the more pleasant of the two, it is a bit more subtle. The Face of Australia Face Base has a slightly cheap plasticy smell to it - though this may have come from the packaging. The smell of both primers fades very soon after application and is not noticeable on the skin.

Packaging
Both primers come in nearly identical 50ml squeeze tubes. The only notable difference, other than the branding, is that the Face of Australia Face Base comes in a tube with a flip top lid whilst the Napoleon Perdis Auto Pilot Primer has a screw top lid. The flip top lid is more convenient as you don't have to juggle a lid along with the tube when you have the primer on your hand.

Performance
If I had been blinded to the products, ie if I had transferred them to unmarked containers, to do the trial then I honestly don't think that I would have been able to tell which one was which. I had never used either primer before this test so it was a new experience for both. I trialled the Face of Australia Face Base first. I applied it to my freshly cleansed skin, without applying any moisturiser. I left it to dry for a few minutes whilst I did my eye makeup, before applying foundation on top. I don't often wear foundation and ended up being a tad disappointed with the Face of Australia Face Base primer but I think that perhaps my expectations were too high. In terms of helping my foundation last longer, it was fantastic. My skin tends to be a little bit oily and I find my foundation slides off in patches, especially on and around my nose but this didn't happen when I used the Face of Australia Face Base. Where I was disappointed was its ability to create a smooth canvas. One thing I don't like about foundation is that I find that it accentuates the wrinkles around my eyes. I was hoping that a primer would fix this problem and fill in the wrinkles, but it didn't. However, when I used the Napoleon Perdis Auto Pilot Primer the same thing happened. So, it seems that the wrinkles around the eyes might be too big a task for a primer to fix, especially as it is a high movement area. I found that when I used the Napoleon Perdis Auto Pilot Primer m foundation also lasted all day and didn't pool or slide off my nose.
Conclusions
I honestly could find no difference between the Face of Australia Face Base and the Napoleon PerdisPerdis Auto Pilot Primer) the only real difference is the price of these two products - with the Napoleon Perdis Auto Pilot Primer being FOUR times more expensive than the Face of Australia Face Base. For this reason I would choose the Face of Australia Face Base over the  Napoleon Perdis Auto Pilot Primer; however, believe that if price is not an issue then you would be equally happy with each primer.

All opinions stated in this blog are my own. I have no affiliation with either Face of Australia or Napolean Perdis. I purchased the Face of Australia Face Base with my own money and was lucky enough to win the Napoleon Perdis Auto Pilot Pre Foundation Primer in a competition on http://www.beautyheaven.com.au/.

Comments (23)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Thank you for the informative review Sarah! I've heard so many people claim this and it's the first time I've read a thorough review on these two products. I love using my Napoleon Perdis primer and I'm yet to try the FOA primer.
1 reply · active less than 1 minute ago
Thanks Rose. I was quite surprised when I heard the claims that they were the same but it wasn't until I actually listed the ingredients side by side that I believed it. It makes me wonder how many other products out there are the same between different brands.

Sent from my iPhone
Great post! The only difference I find with the NP Primer is that I break out from using it. I've had no problems with the FOA and have been using it for a few months now and loving it. I think NP has to do with the fragrance, my skin itches around the temples and cheeks when I've used it!
1 reply · active 719 weeks ago
That's really interesting, Yolanda, that you break out with one and not the other. I found thescent so similar I wouldn't have thought that there was much difference in the fragrance but there must be for you to react to one and not the other. Makes you wonder what is in the fragrance, doesn't it.

Sent from my iPhone
Great article :)
I was wanting to try Auto Pilot but could never justify paying that much for it...Might give FOA a try.
Thanks for the comparison ;)
1 reply · active less than 1 minute ago
No worries, Magda. My sister swears by autopilot so when I first hear the rumours that they were the same I had to compare them. FOA seems to be a bargain if it is the same as autopilot.

Sent from my iPhone
Well that explains it, they obviously come from the same factory in plain packaging and are just re-labeled!!!
1 reply · active 664 weeks ago
It's crazy, isn't it. I wonder if any of their other products are the same...might have to investigate.

Sent from my iPhone
Your primer post was brilliant- this is a great follow on. I bought the FOA last week based on great reviews (loathe to pay for a primer without testing if I liked them and if they worked). this just made me extra glad I was thrifty. fascinating they are so similar in ingredients. I put the FOA on in the morning and barely needed to touch my make-up up at 5pm before heading out. i dont think I'd wear one every day but great for nights out, events after work etc
1 reply · active less than 1 minute ago
Thanks so much for your feedback! I too was shocked at how similar the ingedients are, especially since the difference in price is so huge. I'm glad you were thrifty...you wouldn't have been too happy if it were the autopilot yyou bought last week only to read this review!

From: notifications@intensedebatemail.com
To: starran@hotmail.com
Subject: http://sarah-thescienceofbeauty.blogspot.com/ - New comment on: Product review: Napoleon Perdis Auto Pilot Pre Foundation Primer versus Face of Australia Face Base
how annoying to know i've been paying the higher price for what you think is a better quality product! so many brands do this, (their probably under the same company) but i didnt think napoleon would be one of them. annoyed! great article though
1 reply · active less than 1 minute ago
I didn't even know companies did this until I heard the rumours online and was quite surprised when I lined the ingredients up side by side. I wonder what other products out there are dupes?

Sent from my iPhone
Thank you for a great post! Very informative and I will be following your blog from now on (just discovered it).
Face of Australia really seems to have upped their game these days with a lot of new products and very reasonably priced.
I'll be definitely buying FOA Primer this week :)
1 reply · active less than 1 minute ago
Thanks for your feedback! So far I have only tried the primer, a blush and the molten metallics nail polish from FOA and they are all great. I swatched some of their eyeshadows as priceline and they are gorgeous so also on the wish list!

Sent from my iPhone
Thanks for excellent post~!! I was bit surprised that both have same ingredients including very harmful one- Methylparaben and Propylparaben. Since reading many posts about cosmetic chemical ingredients which is cheap for manufacturers and harmful for customers, I have been extra cautious when purchasing. I have to tell you that I have been looking for really informative aussie beauty blog so long and now I've found it~!!
Sarah they also repackage La femme products too.
1 reply · active 710 weeks ago
wow - I had no idea. Thanks for the tip...I'm now off to check out La femme - I'm not at all familiar with that brand.

From: notifications@intensedebatemail.com
To: starran@hotmail.com
Subject: http://sarah-thescienceofbeauty.blogspot.com/ - New comment on: Product review: Napoleon Perdis Auto Pilot Pre Foundation Primer versus Face of Australia Face Base
I knew that my favourite FOA Primer was brilliant!

Thanks for this, very informative and eye-opening!
Napoleon tests their products on animals, Face of Australia does not
Education is the wealth for the poor, rest for restless, cosmetics for ugly people, power for weak persons, light for blind, hearing power for deaf, speaker for dumb, and wisdom for foolish people.
Face of Australia Face Base i loved it. I wish I did buy the one either but Fake Tan is more Awesome and gives your skin smooth and glow.
Great Information sharing .. I am very happy to read this article .. thanks for giving us go through info.Fantastic nice. I appreciate this post.
nice blogs
great information.
VLCC Institute the Leaders in Beauty & Wellness training, has successfully trained more than 75000 students so far.

Post a new comment

Comments by